Author's response to reviews Title:Effect of Electroacupuncture Stimulation at Zusanli Acupoint (ST36) on Gastric Motility: Possible through PKC and MAPK Signal Transduction Pathways Authors:

Author's response to reviews: see over Dear editor, We are pleased to answer the questions of the reviewers' and the manuscript (MS: 1935814324106763) has also been extensively revised according to the comments and the journal style. This paper was proofread by a native English professional with science background. We are appreciating for each editor's hard work on our manuscript. The manuscript is original in scope and has not been considered elsewhere. The introductory material consists of sentence that carries the reader into the topic There is a logical arrangement of later parts and there is a large body of research in the reference notes. To my understanding, the general subject of the review is quite interesting. However, I think that the manuscript has points that should be observed. 1. Analysis of western blot showed up regulation of CaD and CaP protein expression, but it is necessary to show the results of the densitometric analysis of these bands in which the protein levels were normalized for #-actin. Answer: We showed the results of the densitometric analysis of these bands in which the protein levels were normalized for β-actin in Fig 1. 2. In some occasions add transitions so that it flows from one section to the next. Answer: This paper was proofread by a native English professional with science background and rewrite in some sections.